Motivation
In any organisation, people work not only for money, but also for job satisfaction and happiness. The manager has to communicate and lead and also motivate his subordinates to work. To a large extent, the success of the manager's leadership abilities depends upon his ability to motivate his people to work. Motivation is a force or an impulse which makes a man move physically and mentally to achieve certain goals. Individual motivation is very important for group motivation. Although it is true that “Money makes the mare go’’ in modern business organisations, money is not the only motivating factor and has its own limitations. Money is only a means to satisfy wants. Motivation is something beyond that. Overall, the basic perspective on motivation looks something like this:
Definition of Work motivation
- Process - This is not an object rather method or technique or art
- Energize - Developing inner urge to put effort on successful performance.
- Employee - Person employed to exchange his cognitive, affective and co native domains for achievement of organizational goal for salary etc. as contracted by the organization.
- Work goal - This is well defined, achievable and measurable
- Path - Specific roles and job responsibilities are measurable and related to goal achievement.
Importance of Motivation
- Employees' performance is a result of their abilities and willingness.
- If and when the employees are able, but not willing, it is necessary to motivate them.
- Motivation is the force that moves a person physically and mentally to achieve goals.
- Individual motivation plays an important role in group motivation.
- Happiness and job satisfaction are functions of not only money but also needs and drives.
- It involves (influence of the leader + ability of the followers + role perception of both).
The Basic Theories of Motivation
- Traditional theory - This theory is based on Scientific Management by F W Taylor who advocated that it is the manager's prerogative to decide the quantity, quality, the method of doing jobs and the system of financial compensation for work.
- Human Relations Theory - This theory is based on the research studies of Elton Mayo and Associates at the Hawthorne plant of the Western Electric Co. near Chicago (US), who proved that the output of employees does not depend only on extrinsic factors like working conditions alone, but also on the intrinsic factors of satisfaction of their social and psychological needs.
- The Human Resources Theory - This theory is based on the studies conducted by 20th century management experts including Abraham Maslow, Frederick Herzberg, David McClelland, Douglas McGregor, Peter Drucker, etc. who believed that people are motivated to work, not only by money alone, but also by the satisfaction of their higher order needs for authority, responsibility, achievement and meaningful work.
Barriers of Work Motivation
- Attitude to employees - Considering employee as cog of the machine rather as a human system having unique needs, abilities, personality traits, values, aptitudes, skills etc.
- Work Goal - Undefined, unachievable and unmeasurable
- Path - Job responsibilities are undefined, unachievable, unmeasurable and unrelated to work goal.
- Leadership - Leadership failure in manipulation of incentives.
- Third party - Influence of informal communication systems through colleagues, unions and family members
Strategies to Overcome Barriers
- Job Analysis - More emphasis on personnel specification and regression analysis to determine weight age on job related individual characteristics.
- Human resource accounting - Accounting IQ, EQ, personality traits, aptitude profiles of each employee
- Selection - Selecting right man for right place at the right time.
- Attitude change - Employee as human system having specific needs, aptitudes, temperament, attitudes towards job and the organization
- Role clarity - Well defined job description and work roles. Introduce role drama for role understanding for both lower-level employees and the managers.
- Training - Periodical training to the employees about up gradation of skills, work role analysis and to the leaders about leadership development (communication, manipulation of incentives, decision making etc).
- Survey - Periodical survey to study level of employee satisfaction, attitude towards organizational health and their relations to individual productivity and quality of working life for organizational diagnosis. Introduce organization development programmes for attitude change in considering results of regression analysis.
- Work culture - Introduce quality circle, suggestion box system, and intermingle organization to the life style of the employees.
Maslow's hierarchy of needs
|
NEED |
HOME |
JOB |
|
Self-actualization |
Education,
religion, hobbies, personal growth |
Training,
advancement, growth, creativity |
|
Esteem |
Approval of
family, friends, community |
Recognition,
high status, responsibilities |
|
Safety |
Freedom from
war, poison, violence |
Work safety,
job security, health insurance |
|
Physiological |
Food water
sex |
Heat, Air,
Base Salary |
Herzberg two factor theory
Hygiene Factors
- Company policy and administration
- Wages, salaries and other financial remuneration
- Quality of supervision
- Quality of inter-personal relations
- Working conditions
- Feelings of job security
Motivator Factors
- Status
- Opportunity for advancement
- Gaining recognition
- Responsibility
- Challenging / stimulating work
- Sense of personal achievement & personal growth in a job
Applying Hertzberg's model to de-motivated workers
- Low productivity
- Poor production or service quality
- Strikes / industrial disputes / breakdowns in employee communication and relationships
- Complaints about pay and working conditions
- Job enlargement
- Job rotation
- Job enrichment
Implications of Two-Factor Theory
Limitations of Two-Factor Theory
- The two-factor theory overlooks situational variables.
- Herzberg assumed a correlation between satisfaction and productivity. But the research conducted by Herzberg stressed upon satisfaction and ignored productivity.
- The theory’s reliability is uncertain. Analysis has to be made by the raters. The raters may spoil the findings by analyzing same response in different manner.
- No comprehensive measure of satisfaction was used. An employee may find his job acceptable despite the fact that he may hate/object part of his job.
- The theory ignores blue-collar workers. Despite these limitations, Herzberg’s Two-Factor theory is acceptable broadly.
- The two-factor theory is not free from bias as it is based on the natural reaction of employees when they are enquired the sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction at work. They will blame dissatisfaction on the external factors such as salary structure, company policies and peer relationship. Also, the employees will give credit to themselves for the satisfaction factor at work.
|
Factors
for satisfaction |
Factors
for dissatisfaction |
|
Achievement |
Company Policies |
|
Recognition |
Supervision |
|
The Work
itself |
Relationship
with supervisor and peers |
|
Responsibility |
Work conditions |
|
Advancement |
Salary |
|
Growth |
Status |



0 Comments